Lesson 20

The purpose of this activity is for students to apply what they have learned about circles to solve a multi-step problem (MP1). Students find the area and perimeter of geometric figures whose boundaries are line segments and fractions of circles and use that information to calculate the cost of a project. The shape of the regions in the stained-glass window are left unspecified on purpose to give students an opportunity to engage in an important step of the mathematical modeling cycle - making simplifying assumptions (MP4). Assuming the curves in the design are arcs of a circle is not only reasonable, it is the most expedient assumption to make as well. As students work, prompt them to recognize that they are making this assumption and to make it explicit.

Another opportunity for mathematical modeling in this activity is to discuss if it is reasonable that a person only has to pay for the glass used in the final window and not for possible scraps of glass left over from cutting out the shapes. In reality, if they had to buy the glass at a store, the glass would likely come in square or rectangular sheets and they would need to buy more than they were going to use. If these issues come up, encourage students to keep note of the decisions they are making and to recognize that different choices would lead to different results.

Arrange students in groups of 2. Give students 5 minutes of quiet work time followed by partner and whole-class discussions.

Since there are multiple steps in solving this problem, some students may benefit from having their calculations checked along the way so one early error does not impact the final result.

Some students may struggle finding the diameter or radius lengths. Encourage these students to cut one individual panel, separate the clear glass from the colored glass, and rearrange the figures to see how to determine the length of the diameter and radius.

As groups complete the activity, combine groups of 2 to make groups of 4. If possible, combine groups who solved the problem in different ways. Display the following questions for all to see and tell the group of 4 to discuss: 

• Did you get the same answer? Why or why not?
• Did you use the same strategy? What was the same or different in your work?
• Did you make any assumptions as you worked on the problem?

Ask groups to share the similarities and differences they found in their work. Use MLR 8 (Discussion Supports) to revoice comparison statements and assumptions; ask for details and examples. After each group shares, ask the students if they had any of the same conversations in their own group so as to not have repetitive explanations. Every group does not need to share if the same conversation was had. 

Ask students to make explicit any assumptions they made in their work. If it does not come up, bring out the assumption that the shapes are parts of circles and that the total cost only takes into account the exact area and lengths shown in the figure.

This is a continuation of the previous one. Students use their cost computations from the previous activity to find the cost of an enlarged version of the stained-glass window, which is now scaled by a factor of 3. Students recognize that the lengths of the frame and seams will increase by a factor of 3, while the area of the glass will increase by a factor of \(3^2\).

If students observe that the material for the seams and the frame has width and the scale factor would need to be applied to this measurement, ask them if they can make a simplifying assumption. The width of the seams is never specified or taken into account in the calculations in the previous activity so it is appropriate to continue to put this to the side, as part of the modelling process.

As students work, monitor and select students who solved the problem in different ways to share during the whole-group discussion. If there is a student who quickly assumed they could just multiply their cost from the previous activity by 3, but then realized why they could not do that, select them to share their reasoning.  

As students work in pairs, use MLR 3 (Clarify, Critique, Correct) with the "Critique a Partial or Flawed Response" strategy. Present students with a flawed solution method by a fictitious student. For example, “I learned that when you scale something by a factor, then you multiply things by that factor. If the people want a window three times as big, I multiply what the small window costs by three and get $279. So $450 dollars is more than enough.”

After giving students some quiet think time, ask, "Why isn't $450 enough, even though $450 is more than three times the cost of the original window?" Have students work together to come up with a suggestion to fix the flawed response and possible rules for scaling areas.

Some students might think they can multiply the original cost by 3. Encourage them to compute the lengths and areas of the new window, or remind them that while the side lengths in scaled copies increase by the scale factor, the area increases by the square of the scale factor.

Ask selected students to share their reasoning. If there are students who still think \$450 is enough money, ask them to share their reasoning. Discuss why you cannot just multiply the price of the original design by 3 to find the price of the scaled stained-glass window.

The purpose of this activity is for students to create their own stained-glass design for a given amount of money. The activity is purposefully left open to allow students to either tweak the previous design or create something completely new.

As students work, monitor and select students who either tweaked a previous design or created a new, interesting design to share during the whole-group discussion. 

Students in same groups.  Remind students to include whole or partial circles in their designs. 

Some students may think they need to create a new design and struggle getting started. Point these students to the designs in previous activities and ask how they could modify these designs to meet the cost requirement. 

Display students’ designs for all to see and ask students to explain how they knew their design met the cost requirement. Allow other students to ask questions of the student who is sharing their design.